|
Draft
letter 1 to Tony Blair -Priority for MDG You
can cut and paste this text or load a WORD file to edit letter
1
The
Prime Minister
10
Downing Street,
London
SW1A
2AA
Dear Mr Blair
Millennium
Development Goals v Debt repayments
The leaders of the
G8 have frequently declared their commitment to at least meeting the
Millennium Development Goals. Papers
submitted by the World Bank and IMF to the UN Finance for Development
conference estimate the cost of meeting the Millennium Development Goals
at an additional $54bn/annum for goal 1 and potentially a further
$35bn/annum to achieve the remaining goals.
Meanwhile the poorest countries still pay $23bn/annum in debt
service (even after HIPC, for the 52 countries Jubilee identified).
It cannot be right,
financially, morally or even politically, to be giving a higher priority
to paying debt service than to meeting the Millennium Development Goals.
Debt service must take second priority to the investment needed to
reducing poverty in all its forms.
Your
government has taken a leading role and set an example in debt
cancellation and in championing the cause of justice throughout the world.
Your personal commitment to the meeting the challenges in Africa
have earned widespread acclaim.
Ø
Financing the Millennium Development Goals must take a
higher priority than debt service. The
‘Sustainability’ criteria must be changed to put financing the MDGs
first.
Ø
Debt cancellation is more efficient
and better for the countries than aid.
Following Monterrey, it is now the IFI’s turn!
Ø
Debt
cancellation must be extended to cover all the 65 countries identified by
the World Bank as needing increased aid to meet the MDGs
You
have frequently emphasised your support and commitment to Africa.
That commitment must be translated into UK government insistence
that the World Bank and IMF honour the G8 commitment 'No country genuinely committed to poverty reduction, good
governance and economic reform will be denied the chance to achieve the
Millennium Goals through lack of finance.'
Thank you in advance for your help in saving millions of lives.
Yours
sincerely,
Letter
to Gordon Brown
You
can cut and paste this text or load a WORD file to edit letter
Gordon
The
Rt Hon Gordon Brown MP
The
Chancellor of the Exchequer
HM
Treasury
Parliament
Street,
London
SW1P
3AG
Dear
Chancellor
Cancel
the Debt to meet the MDGs
First I really do
want to congratulate you on your championing the increased aid promised by
the EU and then by the USA prior to the UN Finance for Development
conference. Given the barriers you faced, the promises of increased aid
represent an important step towards poverty reduction, albeit merely one
more step on a long road.
Britain was
party to the Monterrey
Consensus that future reviews of debt sustainability should also include
an analysis of the part that debt relief plays in making progress towards
achieving the 2015 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Similarly 'No
country genuinely committed to poverty reduction, good governance and
economic reform will be denied the chance to achieve the Millennium Goals
through lack of finance.' G8 Action Plan for Africa – 2002
You know that the debt cancellation under HIPC still leaves even
the 26 countries after DP spending over $2.3bn/a on debt service, which
could be spent on poverty reduction, and a third of the HIPC debt relief
still hasn’t been delivered. Five years after enhanced HIPC was agreed
only 26 of the 42 countries have reached Decision Point.
As for meeting the
MDGs, it is now half way from the 1990 base and the new aid promised
doesn’t come fully on stream until 2006, just 9 years to go.
You will have seen the analysis by Jubilee Research showing that
the MDGs cannot be achieved without cancelling the debt.
Perhaps you might find the World Bank’s own figures less
contentious. They show that
for 65 countries, additional aid of $54bn is needed, thus
underlining the importance of debt cancellation, but more importantly that
the HIPC limitation of 42 countries is too restrictive.
What is the
point in giving with one hand and taking back with the other?
|
$54bn
+$35bn /annum
Extra
aid estimated by World Bank/IMF to meet the MDGs for 65 countries
submitted to the UN FfD conference
|
$23bn
/annum
Debt
service extracted from poorest countries even after HIPC for all 52
countries identified by Jubilee 2000
|
Ø
Financing the Millennium Development Goals must take a
higher priority than debt service. The
‘Sustainability’ criteria must be changed to put financing the MDGs
first.
Ø
Debt cancellation is more efficient and better for the
countries than aid. Following
Monterrey, it is now the IFI’s turn!
Ø
Debt cancellation must be extended to cover all the 65
countries identified by the World Bank as needing increased aid to meet
the MDGs
Moreover although
the current political focus to financing development is through the WTO
Doha negotiations, these will have minimal impact on the very poorest
countries because their trade is minimal and could not grow sufficiently
before 2015. Whereas the
World Bank has estimated that cancelling debt would add about 2% to their
GDP growth.
I’m sure that you
are aware that there is widespread support for debt cancellation and that
EDM 736 has the support of over 350 MPs, clearly
demonstrating the political support for meeting the commitments that have
been made. The whole campaign
calls on your leadership at the forthcoming World Bank IMF meeting,
to deliver substantial progress on debt cancellation.
Yours sincerely
Letter
to Baroness Amos
You
can cut and paste this text or load a WORD file to edit letter
Amos
DFID
94
Victoria Street
London
SW1E 5JL
For the attention of -Baroness
Amos
Dear
Minister
Cancel
the Debt to meet the MDGs
The
UK Government deserve congratulations for its leadership in reducing debt
and increasing aid to redress the injustice of world poverty.
Given the barriers you faced, the promises of increased aid before
Monterrey represent another important step towards poverty reduction,
albeit merely one more step on a long road.
You will have
seen the Jubilee Research report that costs achieving the MDGs and clearly
shows that they cannot be achieved whilst still paying debt service. You
know that the debt cancellation under HIPC still leaves
even the 26 countries after DP spending over $2.3bn/a on debt service,
which could be spent on poverty reduction, and a third of the HIPC debt
relief still hasn’t been delivered.
For all the HIPC countries, the total debt service payments are
$7.4bn/a (after HIPC reductions) whilst aid grants are $7.9bn/a!
One step forward, one step back!
Perhaps you
might find the World Bank’s own figures less contentious.
They show that for 65 countries, additional aid of $54bn is
needed, thus underlining the importance of debt cancellation, but more
importantly that the HIPC limitation of 42 countries is too restrictive.
What
is the point in giving with one hand and taking back with the other?
|
$54bn
+$35bn /annum
Extra
aid estimated by World Bank/IMF to meet the MDGs for 65 countries
submitted to the UN FfD conference
|
$23bn
/annum
Debt
service extracted from poorest countries even after HIPC for all 52
countries identified by Jubilee 2000
|
Ø
Financing the Millennium Development Goals must take a
higher priority than debt service. The
‘Sustainability’ criteria must be changed to put financing the MDGs
first.
Ø
Debt cancellation is more efficient and better for the
countries than aid. Following
Monterrey, it is now the IFI’s turn!
Ø
Debt cancellation must be extended to cover all the 65
countries identified by the World Bank as needing increased aid to meet
the MDGs
Moreover although
the current political focus to financing development is through the WTO
Doha negotiations, these will have minimal impact on the very poorest
countries because their trade is minimal and could not grow sufficiently
before 2015. Whereas the
World Bank has estimated that cancelling debt would add about 2% to their
GDP growth.
I’m sure that you
are aware that there is widespread support for debt cancellation and that
EDM 736 has the support of over 350 MPs , clearly
demonstrating the political support for meeting the commitments that have
been made. The whole campaign
calls on your leadership at the forthcoming World Bank IMF meeting,
to deliver substantial progress on debt cancellation.
Yours sincerely
|